TORONTO, May 6, 2014 - Toronto Real Estate Board President
Dianne Usher 
announced that during April – the first full month of spring
– Greater Toronto 
REALTORS® reported a 1.8 per cent year-over-year increase in
sales through the 
TorontoMLS system. Total April 2014 sales amounted to 9,706,
compared to 9,535 
transactions in April 2013. 
“April marked the beginning of the spring market, during
which time we generally see 
the highest monthly sales totals in a given year. Despite
the persistent shortage of 
listings, a substantial number of GTA residents were able to
come to terms on a home 
that met their needs. However, sales levels would have been
higher, but for the lack of 
supply,” said Ms. Usher. 
“A number of factors underlie the constrained supply of
listings. Studies and polling 
suggest that the additional upfront land transfer tax in the
City of Toronto has prompted 
some households to stay put and renovate rather than list
their home and move. In the 
broader GTA context, above-trend home sales in the years
leading up to the recession 
have meant that many households who purchased during this
period simply aren’t ready 
to move again,” continued Ms. Usher. 
The average selling price for April 2014 sales was $577,898
– up by 10.1 per cent 
compared to the April 2013 average of $524,868. The MLS®
Home Price Index (HPI) 
Composite Benchmark was up by seven per cent year-over-year.
The MLS® HPI strips 
away price fluctuations resulting from a change in the mix
of home types sold from one 
period to the next. 
“Price growth for the GTA as a whole was driven by the
single-detached, semi-detached 
and townhouse market segments in the City of Toronto. So far
this year, there has 
been no relief on the listings front for these home types in
many neighbourhoods in 
Toronto and surrounding regions. Until we see a marked and
sustained increase in 
listings, we should expect to see the annual rate of price
growth above the long-term 
norm,” said Jason Mercer, the Toronto Real Estate Board’s
Senior Manager of Market 
Analysis.
Comments